Back to Home Page Weekender November 22, 2008
Editor's Note
Recipes For Success
Weekender Staff
Cover
Sweet smell of success
Chit + Chat
Dalton Tanonaka: People Power And Perceptions
Said & Done
Citizenship on the line
Style Counsel
The Untidy Look
The Long and Short of It
Firm Favorites
Anjasmara
Grab Bag
Single White Male
The Silver Lining
Indulge Yourself
Bye-bye Bling, Time to Get Rough
Taking the reins!
Fashion News
Fashion News
Profile
Joko's Promise
The Movies of Joko Anwar
Art
Java’s Sane Van Gogh
Getting Reel
Emon: Don’t ask, don’t tell
And the Oscar Goes to ...
Point Of View
Odd Man Out
Health
If Your Body Could Talk ...
Dinner Is Served
No Reservation Required
Market Place
Sizing Up the Market
On A Jet Plane
Port Moresby: Scarred Beauty
Travel News
‘Beauty’ Kit
20/20
‘I’m fed up with the kids’ question’

Bye-bye Bling, Time to Get Rough

When it comes to diamonds, you had better put away the in-your-face, blinding dazzle of bling. That was soooo five minutes ago.

Everybody likes to talk about diamonds, especially concerning the glittering good fortune of Jennifer Lopez, who snagged a 6-carat pink diamond from Ben Affleck, and moved on to bigger and better things with a 14.5-carat blue diamond from Marc Antony.

Buying diamonds is sometimes not only about making the wearer shine, but also their bag. A client of Hermes ordered a diamond-encrusted Birkin bag, but Hermes was considered to have used jewels that were too small for her taste. Yet more proof that sense and sensibility is often in short supply among some of us. 

But maybe it’s such go-it-alone folk who set the trends for the rest of us. That is what came to mind when I read that New York department store Bergdorf Goodman’s Christmas catalog featured an 89-carat cocktail ring. But it was already sold to a wealthy woman with US$100,000 at her disposal when the catalog rolled off the press.

Apart from its size, what set the gem apart was that it had been neither cut nor polished. “We didn’t touch the diamond at all, except for cleaning off the dirty,” Anjanette Clisura, president of New York-based company Diamond in the Rough, told The International Herald Tribune.

According to the trend-watchers, the glow is gone. “Bling has officially expired,” said Britt Bivens, director of 4.5 Production in New York, a trend consulting agency.

Uncut diamonds were first valued by Indian maharajas, who coveted the gems from the mystical mines of Golconda hundreds of years ago. Europe became enamored of the diamonds in the 17th century, and that fascination has remained.  

Maybe losing some of our senses is needed in this country. Not to commit corruption or videotape bedroom frolics, but to be brave enough to become a pioneer instead of simply following the rest. So if everybody else is wearing shining jewels at an event, dare to be different with unpolished diamonds. At least you will not be another one of the style imitators, even if the fuddy-duddies think you have taken leave of your senses. With or without diamonds, you will have displayed the real you, without becoming a walking billboard proclaiming “Look at me, I’m rich!”
+ Samuel Mulia

Shining Through
Don’t be afraid if you wish to shine out from the rest, but your cash flow is not bright enough to qualify for a platinum card. Jeweler Asprey understands, and has created a collection that makes sense for you. Instead of diamonds, its earrings are crafted with citrine, blue topaz and amethyst. The price is almost $1,000 – the same price as the in Chanel plastic handbag – but it’s small change compared to what you would pay for real gems. And you can take pride in wearing the creations of jewelers who have been serving English royalty since Queen Victoria in the 19th century.


Home